riding a motor cycle does the same for me that horse back riding does for Jocelyn001 if I get in the right position - it's great like one big viberator!
Education is a pleasure and unfortunately far too many people today are nothing more than functional morons who are oblivious to their own idiocy because they have a tablette or some other type of electronic gadget. So if you want to know more of what I based my comment on, I recommend reading the book "The naked ape" by Desmond Morris ISBN 0-385-33430-3
That's one way of looking at it, but that's not necessarily the case. My girlfriend has an outie. I accept her and eat it all the time. It's just that I do like the ones that are closed until they are aroused. It's hot. I would never chose someone just because she has that kind of pussy. I'm not that shallow.
The first time it happened I was on the back with my boyfriend driving. When he realized what was happening he stopped and took me in the bushes of someone's yard. It was good that it was night time! Hell of a rocking ride! And for the record...guess I'd be considered an outie - and lovin' it!!
Wow so if I have an "innie" and I choose to shave then I can only pull guys with a latent pedo streak? Nevermind though, cos only girls with a latent fetish for screwing homeless people go for guys with beards.
Yeah because munching on a chick with beef curtains down to her knees and piss stained pubic hair that could rival zz tops beard is real attractive...:ack2: Personally my self as a male I like to keep everything trimmed nice an neat and prefer my women shaved. PREFER, not that I demand it. If Im going to put in the effort to keep my shit looking nice then I expect the same. I just find pubic hair to be gross. Theres nothing wrong with a a trimmed landing strip though :lol: I don't think I have a preference as far inny or outty but I do think its rather ignorant to think because a guy prefers an inny makes him a pedophile. IMO There is nothing attractive about a vagina that looks like a pile of roast beef :2cents:
That's so ridiculous and ludicrous to accuse someone of having hidden intentions of pedophilia, just because they like a certain type of pussy. I love big labia majora that press together and make a crack. It's so hot. I love pussy, so it really doesn't matter, but i prefer an innie, because they are sexy and more appealing to me. Some outies can be hideous looking, compared to an innie. And there's nothing wrong with having them surgically altered. If it can be done and someone would like to change the look of their pussy, why judge them? I think breast implants are a worse idea. I feel that if a woman is sexy, it doesn't matter what size her tits are. It's obvious that they're filled with water or silicone balloons anyway. Most of them look ridiculous
Here's an education for those that claim shave genitals isn't defacto pedophilia. I'll use wikipedia because I have no interest in transcribing several pages of text from several text books. If anyone is interested in learning more than this will get them started. And for those that aren't interested, the can go back to being dumb screen monkeys. Source : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny Definition : Neoteny and pedomorphism Translation : Since we grow pubic hair on our genitals as a sign of sexual maturity we can assume that Pedomorphism is not indicative of the human species in this respect. In layman's terms pubic hair is nature's way of saying. "Ok all those with pubic hair are old enough to fuck." Note in the above list of neotenous traits in women the one thing NOT listed is a hairless vagina. So if anyone that actively seeks or prefers women with shaved pussies. They're either active pedophiles trying to turn a mature woman into a child. Or they're closet pedophiles living in denile. Or... they're the same genre of moron sucker that gets taken in by media hype and marketing, in this case hype created by pornographic films.
I like innies! but i have to say that if i like the girl...i don't give a damn if she has an innie or outie...it's still gonna be a lot of fun to ride...and that's all that matters
haha...did this seriously happen?? that's actually really hot...it's strange because as i guy i don't think know if there's anything out there that would get me off without direct contact with a woman....hmmm...something to think about
Your quotes concern development, but the ability to grow hair does not mean that it's regressing to shave.... a lot of people shave their faces, pubes, ass hair, legs, armpits....scalps....... I trim some of those, as do a huge number of others. I don't see that it makes anyone a pedophile to have a preference. I can see a pedophile prefering partners who shave, but not everyone who does is a pedophile. I personally don't care that much, but at least trimming is nice, most people's hair can get out of hand, I know mine can. Your quotes are about developmental speed, nowhere does any of them say anything that translates to "if you prefer a partner who shaves their pubes, you're a pedophile", or even close, really.
Or they prefer the feel, the smell, the look, and the taste of a shaved pussy! I love when my girlfriend shaves, because she smells and tastes fresher. Also, her hair grows really close to her clit, so it's hard to get to with all that hair. When it's shaved, I can suck on her clit, without having to work around her coarse hair. Many women shave it just because they don't like hair on it and they think it's cleaner. BTW, If you're going to try to educate people who are educated, learn to spell or use spell check.
It DID actually happen. I didn't even fully know it was coming. Maybe I sensed some arousal, and then got to a stop light and vibration from the motorcycle changed from rapid on the highway, to deeper at an idle. Blamo! Orgasm.
All hair that grows in the post-puberty years is, by definition, pubic hair, be it around the genitals, under the arms on the chest or on the face etc. By your logic, that would make any preference of personal grooming to be indicative of potential paedophila. Furthermore, Wikipedia is notorious for being a source of all sorts of bogus information, seeing as entries can literally be made by anyone who wants to give totally fictitious claims the appearance of scientific legitimacy.